Flotsam and Jetsam that raise some lingering questions
Jan 17th, 2010 | Filed under: AAA Newsreels, Today's PostThe Managed Funds Association’s decision to wade into the data collection business is a blessing or a curse, depending on who you are. For academics, this initiative could provide the kind of exhaustive industry data needed to get an accurate picture of the industry. But for existing data collection players (many of whom manage to track only a portion of the industry), it amounts to a serious competitive concern. We’ll be interested to see how they respond if and when the MFA gets this project off the ground.
A lucky break? Or something else?
With nearly three-quarters of new assets coming from institutions in 2009 and most redemptions coming from high net worth investors, it’s no surprise that institutions are reported to have the “upper hand…just as hedge funds stage comeback” (P&I). The question remains, however, is this a stroke of luck for institutional investors, have institutions fueled this very comeback or have they simply managed to sniff out a good opportunity before the train left the station?
Then again, maybe the hedge funds themselves “have the upper hand.” RAB Capital, for example, is actively seeking out institutional investors. CEO Stephen Couttie told Reuters recently that although only a quarter of the firm’s assets are from institutions, they represent around half of new assets:
“It (net inflows across the business) began towards the end of the first half. We’re beginning to see now a bit more consistency…We’re putting more effort on focusing on institutions.”
Intentional Lies or Sloppy Due Diligence Questionnaires?
There has been a lot of research over the past few years about inaccuracies in the information communicated by hedge fund managers during due diligence. It tends to be a bit dry sometimes. But hedge fund due diligence company Swiss Analytics provides some interesting real-life anecdotes (via Barclayhedge) this month. The firm gives examples such as this:
Please provide us the % of AuM accounted for by the largest three clients.
Manager: Largest three investors account for 10%, 7%, and 5% of fund AuM, respectively.
Due Diligence Findings: SwissAnalytics contacts two funds of funds we know are invested in the fund, each of which disclose investments in the fund amounting to approximately 30% of AuM.
Those of you with the responsibility for keep 100+ page DDQs up to date (and informing recipients of any changes since their particular hardcopy was printed) may have some sympathy for this hedge fund manager. A loss of $10 million coupled with redemptions of $30 million can increase a 17% share to a 30% share within months. That’s no excuse for incorrect information. But it makes you wonder how much of this “misinformation” is really as nefarious as it is often made out to be.
New kid on the hedge fund recruiting block
Nefarious or not, the SEC isn’t going to have any more of it. So the commission is now going up against hedge funds themselves in the war for talent. Reuters reports:
“Veteran hedge fund and markets professionals are also in demand at the SEC, where a promise of increasing government enforcement and the creation of a new Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation are leading to new hires.”
This may have sounded like a winner idea when hedge funds were dumping staff overboard. But now that the hedge funds seem to be fighting for talent again, can the SEC still afford to make good on its plans?
“Stuff” flows downhill
After posting 2009 returns of approximately half the overall industry average, funds of funds are taking a bit of a drubbing right now. There are many reasons for this performance delta. But whatever the cause, funds of funds may now be taking a page from the playbook of endowments and pensions. As regular readers know, these investors have come together over the past year to shine a public light on what they believe are inappropriate business practices.
Reuters reports that at least one major UK-based funds of funds is “rallying its peers” to “get agreement on how to better handle the managers running their money.”
According to Reuters, Hermes BKP Partners “…gathered the working group together at its London offices on Tuesday [Jan. 12] to kick-start a project it hopes will improve the disclosures made by hedge funds.”
Hermes’ CEO described the meeting as “…essentially a small group of peers with shared experiences talking about how they interact with underlying managers and exchanging information.”
Sounds a lot like how a similar group (this one of end-investors), the “Global Association of Alternative Investors” was born a couple of years ago. According to the GAAI’s mission statement, it also aims to “share ideas of mutual interest.” Translation: Both groups are likely to kick-*** and take names in the coming years.
Related Posts
- 7 Questions for Anthony Scaramucci of Skybridge Capital
- 7 questions for Greg Dowling
- 7 Questions for John Rowsell of Man Investments
- 7 Questions for Adam Patti, CEO of IndexIQ
- AAA Exclusive: 7 questions for Roger Ibbotson







Today, we bring you the final installment of our “Summer of 1,000 Posts”
Today, we bring you another installment of our “Summer of 1,000 posts”
Today, we bring you another installment of our “Summer of 1,000 Posts” 


Today, we bring you another installment of our “Summer of 1,000 posts” 
Is a thaw coming to the frozen streams of money that built the hedge fund industry? According
AllAboutAlpha.com rolled into the Chicago earlier today. So if you see our tour bus rolling around the Windy City with the giant alpha symbol on the side, please wave and say hello.
Double Black Diamond:

