HF managed accounts may not be no-brainer. May require quarter – maybe half – a brain after all.

Jun 11th, 2009 | Filed under: Hedge Fund Industry Trends, Today's Post

With the notable shenanigans perpetrated by some hedge fund managers, managed accounts seem like a no-brainer.  After all, who wouldn’t want to be in full control of their own private hedge fund?  You could redeem whenever you wanted, get real time position-level transparency and even do your own valuations.

But as we have suggested in the past, the situation is not quite this simple.  Unfortunately, no managed account is an island.  The legal separation of assets does not sever the fund’s destiny from those of other similar (especially parri passu) managed accounts and funds.  If the managed accounts are not parri passu (for example, if each investor overlays their own risk management rules) then this problem would be solved.  But it would open up another issue: each fund would be different and would have no appropriate track record.

This is one of the points raised in a slide deck being circulated by due diligence company SwissAnalytics.  One of the slides in the presentation (available here at Barclayhedge’s website) contains the following helpful summary of the pros and cons of managed accounts: More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. More from Managed Accounts USA in New York
  2. Managed Accounts: Not just for breakfast any more
  3. HF Managed Accounts: A tool for change or tilting the playing field?
  4. Do managed accounts reduce asymmetries or enhance them? It may depend on who you ask.
  5. Managed Accounts USA: Conference notebook


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com