A novel approach to monitoring daily HF returns when they don’t actually exist

Apr 12th, 2009 | Filed under: Alternative Beta & Hedge Fund Replication, Today's Post

In just about every action movie and TV show these days there is at least one scene where the hero asks one of his or her techies to “sharpen” a satellite image.  Suddenly, what looked like a fuzzy bunch of pixelated squares takes on the form of someone’s face, a car, or some kind of mobile rocket launcher.   We’re not graphic imaging specialists.  But to us, it looks kind of outlandish that someone could take a very small amount of information (a few pixels) and divine the underlying image in fantastic detail.

But in a way, that’s exactly what Daniel Li & Michael Markov (of quantitative investment software vendor Markov Processes) and Russ Wermers of the University of Maryland have done in a paper released last month called “Monitoring Daily Hedge Fund Performance When Only Monthly Data is Available.”  Their trick is to leverage another kind of technology: hedge fund replication.

As we have reported extensively, “linear factor replication” aims to predict the performance of hedge funds based on a multiple regression of their historical returns on a number of variables such as equities, Fama/French factors, and several more “exotic” risk factors. More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. With hedge funds back in the black, how are the hedge fund “clones” doing?
  2. Kat rebuts itemized list of criticisms over his approach
  3. New approach gets hedge fund returns with traditional risk
  4. Returns of so-called “dead” hedge funds found not to be that bad after all
  5. Unscrambling the performance fee egg yields new insights into hedge fund returns


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com