Incubation bias: Not just a hedge fund issue according to two law professors

Apr 8th, 2009 | Filed under: Performance, Analytics & Metrics, Today's Post

It is often argued that aggregate hedge fund performance data suffers from a near-fatal flaw: since it is voluntarily reported by the manager, hedge fund indices only include funds that the managers have deemed marketable.  In 2002, David Hsieh of Duke University and William Fung of London Business School wrote a seminal article on this issue called “Benchmarks of Hedge Fund Performance: Information Content and Measurement Biases.”

In contrast, regulations often require mutual funds to register with securities authorities before they can begin to assemble a track record.  As a result, mutual fund data is assumed to be free of such bias.

But as Alan Palmiter and Ahmed Taha, law professors at Wake Forest University write in a forthcoming article for the Vanderbilt Law Review called Star Creation: The Manipulation of Mutual Fund Performance Through Incubation“, the requirement for a mutual fund to register does not eliminate the problems arising from so-called “mutual fund incubation.”

Observe the professors: More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. Hedge fund alpha remains in the eyes of the beholder
  2. A “small-cap bias” in hedge funds themselves?
  3. Short-bias hedge funds: Masochists or Yeomen?
  4. SEC Hedge Fund Registration: Now Just A Seal of Approval?
  5. If hedge fund “overcrowding” was bad for returns, is recent “undercrowding” going to be good?


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com