Pendulum swinging back to investable hedge fund indices for passive HF exposure
Mar 18th, 2009 | Filed under: Alternative Beta & Hedge Fund Replication, Today's Post
Passive investment in hedge funds has always been somewhat of an oxymoron. Hedge funds, after all, aim to deliver active management (alpha). And since alpha is a zero sum game, a passive investment in hedge funds should deliver a zero return. Nonetheless, this axiom has always been challenged by proponents of various products designed to deliver aggregate “hedge fund returns”.
First there was the passive fund of funds; then came the investable hedge fund index; and finally there was hedge fund replication. In essence, all of these products delivered similar value propositions: diversification, transparency, and liquidity. (Despite the tendency for these providers to compete on returns, out-performance was never officially the goal of these “passive” products).
Hedge fund replication seemed to be the story of the year in 2008. But in the post-Madoff environment, the pendulum may be swinging back in the other direction. The investable hedge fund index – derided by proponents of hedge fund replication as being expensive and opaque since it invests in hedge funds themselves - is making a comeback. More…
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.
Related Posts
- Kat: Why Accurately Replicated Hedge Fund Indices Won’t Do You Much Good
- August Redux? Some hedge fund indices lower and some higher than infamous month from hell
- New Deutsche Bank hedge fund replication offering gets both laurels and darts
- Hedge fund replication is “imitation crab meat” according to major hedge fund company
- Hedge Fund Indices: Seeing the industry through a prism




