Research finds that small HF investment minimums equal small HF investment returns
|Jan 29th, 2009 | Filed under: Academic Research, Editor's Pick, Today's Post | By: Alpha Male||
High minimum investment levels have always been a sign of exclusivity in the hedge fund industry. But does a higher minimum investment level mean a higher return? According to one study, the answer may be “yes”.
Kelvin Huang, a Ph.D. candidate at Canada’s leading business school – Queen’s University School of Business (disclosure) obviously spent a lot of time examining this relationship. His findings were published in December in his thesis “The Impact of Minimum Investment Barriers on Hedge Funds: Are retail investors getting the short end of performance.” (available here)
Before trying to figure out if big ticket funds have big ticket returns, Huang collected historical data on minimum investment levels from the CISDM database. As you can see from the chart below from his paper, the number of hedge funds with a $1 million+ minimum grew disproportionately between 1995 and 2005:
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.
- Regulators take note: New research finds mutual fund managers do better, not worse, when they also manage “side-by-side” hedge funds
- Research finds most equity indices actually contain alpha
- Study finds secondary HF markets can predict future fund returns
- Study finds many hedge funds simply hold back liquidity to power returns
- A Battle Cry for Hedge Funds—Separate but not Equal