<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Despite operational risk reporting standards, chasm remains between hedge fund investors and managers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2009/01/25/despite-operational-risk-reporting-standards-chasm-remains-between-hedge-fund-investors-and-managers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2009/01/25/despite-operational-risk-reporting-standards-chasm-remains-between-hedge-fund-investors-and-managers/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2009/01/25/despite-operational-risk-reporting-standards-chasm-remains-between-hedge-fund-investors-and-managers/comment-page-1/#comment-150826</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=4129#comment-150826</guid>
		<description>This is just a guess, but here goes: Institutional investors are used to the operational transparency/reliability of regulated products that are simpler.  They are not used to digging into the nuts and bolts of operations -- it is boring, as you point out, and the payoffs are uncertain.  Loss prevention is always duller than hearing a good story about the advantages of an investment group&#039;s past successes and durable advantages.

But with anything unregulated and unusual, this sory of due diligence is critical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a guess, but here goes: Institutional investors are used to the operational transparency/reliability of regulated products that are simpler.  They are not used to digging into the nuts and bolts of operations &#8212; it is boring, as you point out, and the payoffs are uncertain.  Loss prevention is always duller than hearing a good story about the advantages of an investment group&#8217;s past successes and durable advantages.</p>
<p>But with anything unregulated and unusual, this sory of due diligence is critical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
