<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back-of-the-envelope analysis shows hedge fund indexes not lining up with each other this fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/12/01/back-of-the-envelope-analysis-shows-hedge-fund-indexes-not-lining-up-with-each-other-this-fall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/12/01/back-of-the-envelope-analysis-shows-hedge-fund-indexes-not-lining-up-with-each-other-this-fall/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rwilson</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/12/01/back-of-the-envelope-analysis-shows-hedge-fund-indexes-not-lining-up-with-each-other-this-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-144673</link>
		<dc:creator>Rwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=3749#comment-144673</guid>
		<description>Nice analysis..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice analysis..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpha Male</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/12/01/back-of-the-envelope-analysis-shows-hedge-fund-indexes-not-lining-up-with-each-other-this-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-144623</link>
		<dc:creator>Alpha Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=3749#comment-144623</guid>
		<description>Yes. That’s right.  Way back in 2003 Edhec developed a set of indexes that were essentially an “average of averages”.  At the time, they wrote:  “Given that it is impossible to come up with an objective judgment on what is the best existing index, a natural idea consists of using some combination of competing indexes...&quot;.  So we&#039;d imagine that Edhec probably experiences the same challenges dealing with dynamically-changing ranges around each sub-index mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. That’s right.  Way back in 2003 Edhec developed a set of indexes that were essentially an “average of averages”.  At the time, they wrote:  “Given that it is impossible to come up with an objective judgment on what is the best existing index, a natural idea consists of using some combination of competing indexes&#8230;&#8221;.  So we&#8217;d imagine that Edhec probably experiences the same challenges dealing with dynamically-changing ranges around each sub-index mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnni Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/12/01/back-of-the-envelope-analysis-shows-hedge-fund-indexes-not-lining-up-with-each-other-this-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-144572</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnni Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=3749#comment-144572</guid>
		<description>I thought the EDHEC Alternative Indexes was setup to deal exactly with this issue..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the EDHEC Alternative Indexes was setup to deal exactly with this issue..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
