<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whither the Clones?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/09/17/whither-the-clones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/09/17/whither-the-clones/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Abernathy</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/09/17/whither-the-clones/comment-page-1/#comment-134809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Abernathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=3418#comment-134809</guid>
		<description>&quot;In the seven months to July 2008, for example, performance on the replication products we monitor varied between -15.7% and +3.8%.&quot;

That -15.7% number comes from a failed Deutsche Bank product.  The other products are in a very tight cluster.  These are the unvarnished facts:  alternative beta products- net of fees- have proven themselves in the most difficult market environment in hedge fund history.  

For example, the Stonebrook Alternative Beta Fund (net of fees) had cumulative returns of 1.03% from it&#039;s inception in May, 2007 through August, 2008.  The compares to 0.04% for the HFRIFWC and -1.45% for the HFRIFOF indices.  Moreover, Stonebrook had a 0.84 correlation to the HFRIFWC and 0.75 to the HFRIFOF.  These returns are not dissimilar from our peers.

If you are an investor, you should be ask what percentage of fund-of-fund returns can be attributed to alternative beta.  It should be your benchmark.  And you should combine alternative beta with high-alpha managers to maximize the performance of your hedge fund portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In the seven months to July 2008, for example, performance on the replication products we monitor varied between -15.7% and +3.8%.&#8221;</p>
<p>That -15.7% number comes from a failed Deutsche Bank product.  The other products are in a very tight cluster.  These are the unvarnished facts:  alternative beta products- net of fees- have proven themselves in the most difficult market environment in hedge fund history.  </p>
<p>For example, the Stonebrook Alternative Beta Fund (net of fees) had cumulative returns of 1.03% from it&#8217;s inception in May, 2007 through August, 2008.  The compares to 0.04% for the HFRIFWC and -1.45% for the HFRIFOF indices.  Moreover, Stonebrook had a 0.84 correlation to the HFRIFWC and 0.75 to the HFRIFOF.  These returns are not dissimilar from our peers.</p>
<p>If you are an investor, you should be ask what percentage of fund-of-fund returns can be attributed to alternative beta.  It should be your benchmark.  And you should combine alternative beta with high-alpha managers to maximize the performance of your hedge fund portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
