Fees: Six of one or half-dozen of the other.
|Aug 11th, 2008 | Filed under: Academic Research, Investment Management Fees | By: Alpha Male||
Pop Quiz: Which are more expensive, hedge funds or mutual funds?
Sounds like a pretty dumb question, right? Well as regular readers will know, this question is actually central to our views here at AAA. Over two years ago, we told you about an academic study called “Measuring the True Cost of Active Management by Mutual Funds” by Ross Miller of the State University of New York. Miller argued that since mutual funds could be largely replicated by low-cost index funds or ETFs, the implicit fee for their active management was significantly higher than the posted expense ratios. For good reason, the paper was subsequently included in the Q1 2007 edition of the Journal of Investment Management.
The latest to make this argument is Mark Kritzman of Windham Capital. In his article “Who Charges More: Hedge Funds or Mutual Funds?” (Winter 2008 Journal of Applied Corporate Finance) Kritzman says:
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.
- Researchers: If index funds are a commodity, why are their fees so divergent?
- The “No Arbitrage” Rule Applied to Hedge & Mutual Fund Fees
- Five Myths about fees: The truth behind analyzing fees in the context of investment goals
- Hurdle Rates: The (Missing) Link Between Beta and Hedge Fund Fees
- Think hedge funds face an uphill battle on fees? It turns out that mutual funds may actually have it worse.