130/30 rationale, value, and “myths” covered in newly released slideware

Jun 8th, 2008 | Filed under: 130/30, Today's Post

Earlier this month, Pensions & Investments held a tri-city 130/30 dog-and-pony show in San Francisco, Chicago and New York.  And this week, they released several presentations given at the event.  So if you happened to have missed the show when it came through town, you might be interested in seeing the slideware available here at P&I.  Below we give you our take.

John Power of Pyramis gave a succinct overview of the rationale, costs and benefits of 130/30 that also included what has probably become the most popular slide in any 130/30 presentation:

The key message, of course, is that you simply can’t bet against most names in the index in a significant manner.  In our view, the difference between underweighting a 0.5% position by 0.5% and underweighting it by, say, 0.6% isn’t significant from an investment standpoint (some might argue the requisite introduction of short-selling brings with it some new operational issues).

More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. Is an “integrated” 130/30 portfolio always better than a “combined” one?
  2. Debunking Some Myths About Active Management
  3. Paper revisits what it means for a manager to be truly “active”
  4. So much for “double alpha”
  5. New research explores whether 130/30 is actually "optimal"


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com