<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alpha-centric investing described as a &#8220;seismic shift&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/05/09/alpha-centric-investing-described-as-a-seismic-shift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/05/09/alpha-centric-investing-described-as-a-seismic-shift/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russ Kamp - CEO, Invesco Quantitative Strategies</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/05/09/alpha-centric-investing-described-as-a-seismic-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-104177</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Kamp - CEO, Invesco Quantitative Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/05/09/alpha-centric-investing-described-as-a-seismic-shift/#comment-104177</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is the direction that the plan sponsor community is taking, and as a provider of absolute return strategies for more than 17 years, I am certainly pleased to see this development.  However, I am concerned that plan sponsors and their consultants are incapable of making two important decisions (alpha and beta providers) when they&#039;ve had difficulty making one decision in the past.  This may be a formula for disaster in terms of funding.

BTW, 130/30 funds are not alternatives, as many unfortuantely have described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is the direction that the plan sponsor community is taking, and as a provider of absolute return strategies for more than 17 years, I am certainly pleased to see this development.  However, I am concerned that plan sponsors and their consultants are incapable of making two important decisions (alpha and beta providers) when they&#8217;ve had difficulty making one decision in the past.  This may be a formula for disaster in terms of funding.</p>
<p>BTW, 130/30 funds are not alternatives, as many unfortuantely have described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
