<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media turns hostile: 130/30 now &#8220;dubious&#8221; &#8220;overblown&#8221; &#8220;faddish&#8221; &#8220;hype&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt French</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-99735</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/#comment-99735</guid>
		<description>By design, 1X0/X0 funds are meant to give investors more of a portfolio&#039;s active strategy for every dollar invested, without changing the level of market exposure. Period. A manager who is successful with a long-only strategy should be maybe half again more successful with 1X0/X0, versus a correct benchmark.

Since there&#039;s so much debate as to whether active managers can add any value over fees, it&#039;s unsurprising that more of those strategies, with no letup of fees, will generate similar debate as to whether the approach adds value.

It&#039;s reasonable to hope that more savvy managers will be in the avant garde for 1X0/X0, but why wouldn&#039;t the best clue be how well these managers do with long only?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By design, 1X0/X0 funds are meant to give investors more of a portfolio&#8217;s active strategy for every dollar invested, without changing the level of market exposure. Period. A manager who is successful with a long-only strategy should be maybe half again more successful with 1X0/X0, versus a correct benchmark.</p>
<p>Since there&#8217;s so much debate as to whether active managers can add any value over fees, it&#8217;s unsurprising that more of those strategies, with no letup of fees, will generate similar debate as to whether the approach adds value.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s reasonable to hope that more savvy managers will be in the avant garde for 1X0/X0, but why wouldn&#8217;t the best clue be how well these managers do with long only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuesday links: trade planning &#171; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/comment-page-1/#comment-99249</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuesday links: trade planning &#171; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/04/21/media-turns-hostile-13030-now-dubious-overblown-faddish-hype/#comment-99249</guid>
		<description>[...] 130/30 managers do not face unique challenges, that long-only investors somehow avoid. (All About Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 130/30 managers do not face unique challenges, that long-only investors somehow avoid. (All About Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
