Hedge fund closure data: ebola or just a bleeding nose?

Apr 6th, 2008 | Filed under: Hedge Fund Industry Trends

We’re usually content to let sleeping dogs lie after issuing an opinion on mass media bias against hedge funds.  But we have to quickly follow-up on Tuesday’s posting about hedge fund attrition.  We argued that creative headline writers continue to have a hate-on with hedge funds, cooking up story titles like “1000 hedge funds may sink in turmoil” in reference to the industry’s rather unnoteworthy 10% turnover rate.

That same day MarketWatch published a story entitled “Hedge-fund hemorrhage: $60 billion liquidated in last three years, shrinking investor options.

Pa-leese, $60 billion in a $2 trillion+ industry over 3 years is a nosebleed and in no way suggests the industry is a hemophiliac.

Says MarketWatch:

More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. What are we to make of hedge fund attrition data?
  2. New data on hedge fund launches may be worse (or better) than first meets the eye
  3. Let The Data Set You Free
  4. “Non-Top-100″ hedge fund segment is flat-lining
  5. 2007: Year of Hedge/Mutual Fund Convergence?

Leave Comment