<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passive managers spark space race with launch of new satellites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/13/passive-managers-spark-space-race-with-launch-of-new-satellites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/13/passive-managers-spark-space-race-with-launch-of-new-satellites/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RMahmud</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/13/passive-managers-spark-space-race-with-launch-of-new-satellites/comment-page-1/#comment-91316</link>
		<dc:creator>RMahmud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/13/passive-managers-spark-space-race-with-launch-of-new-satellites/#comment-91316</guid>
		<description>Asset management has been moving away from constrained and closet indexing. Investors that go for the passive indexing route leave money on the table and the best of the brave ones that go for active should be successful, if at least only some of the time.

In other words, it may be possible that the increasing polarisation of investing (unconstrained active and passive indexing) could generate more inefficiencies. This is on top of the creation of new markets in emerging countries that are still relatively inefficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asset management has been moving away from constrained and closet indexing. Investors that go for the passive indexing route leave money on the table and the best of the brave ones that go for active should be successful, if at least only some of the time.</p>
<p>In other words, it may be possible that the increasing polarisation of investing (unconstrained active and passive indexing) could generate more inefficiencies. This is on top of the creation of new markets in emerging countries that are still relatively inefficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
