<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End of (asset management) History?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt French</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/comment-page-1/#comment-90731</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/#comment-90731</guid>
		<description>Frankly, the $100 billion seemed a bit low. The $1.5 trillion (est market cap) Financial Service industry has other income besides the tips it collects as MaÃƒ®tre d&#039; to the capital markets, but Wall Street DOES have expensive habits to support.

I also wonder about this fixation on scoring who beats the market versus who doesn&#039;t. If there were a perfectly efficient market, and half the investors made low-risk, low-return investors, they should be just as happy as the high-risk, high-return crowd. Except you&#039;d have all these white-shoe types telling you that you could earn more, never mention the risk, and the little two-and-twenty intermediation they would be performing for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, the $100 billion seemed a bit low. The $1.5 trillion (est market cap) Financial Service industry has other income besides the tips it collects as MaÃƒ®tre d&#8217; to the capital markets, but Wall Street DOES have expensive habits to support.</p>
<p>I also wonder about this fixation on scoring who beats the market versus who doesn&#8217;t. If there were a perfectly efficient market, and half the investors made low-risk, low-return investors, they should be just as happy as the high-risk, high-return crowd. Except you&#8217;d have all these white-shoe types telling you that you could earn more, never mention the risk, and the little two-and-twenty intermediation they would be performing for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday links: surprise modeling &#171; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/comment-page-1/#comment-90654</link>
		<dc:creator>Thursday links: surprise modeling &#171; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/#comment-90654</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;At the end of the day, most academics seem to now believe that markets are pretty efficient, but not perfectly efficient.&#8221; (All About Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;At the end of the day, most academics seem to now believe that markets are pretty efficient, but not perfectly efficient.&#8221; (All About Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolfen</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/comment-page-1/#comment-90635</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolfen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/03/12/the-end-of-asset-management-history/#comment-90635</guid>
		<description>It might be an interesting situation if everyone holds the &quot;market&quot; by investing in an ETF. The efficient capital flows, going to &quot;better&quot; firms, incentives for companies to perform etc. would disappear. Or am I missing something and thus horribly wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be an interesting situation if everyone holds the &#8220;market&#8221; by investing in an ETF. The efficient capital flows, going to &#8220;better&#8221; firms, incentives for companies to perform etc. would disappear. Or am I missing something and thus horribly wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
