<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAA Exclusive: An Interview with Managers of the World&#8217;s Newest Hedge Fund Replication Product</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/01/17/aaa-exclusive-an-interview-with-managers-of-the-worlds-newest-hedge-fund-replication-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/01/17/aaa-exclusive-an-interview-with-managers-of-the-worlds-newest-hedge-fund-replication-product/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/01/17/aaa-exclusive-an-interview-with-managers-of-the-worlds-newest-hedge-fund-replication-product/comment-page-1/#comment-73508</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2008/01/17/aaa-exclusive-an-interview-with-managers-of-the-worlds-newest-hedge-fund-replication-product/#comment-73508</guid>
		<description>I love the marketing gimmick being played by this fund, and others of its ilk.  &quot;We&#039;ll match the hedge fund &#039;beta&#039; and return stream, but be transparent and less expensive, so PLEASE mister institution, place your &#039;alternative&#039; allocation with US!&quot;

Here&#039;s another idea.  Use the same approach, but rather than model an index, model a **constant** return!, and market it as a &quot;whole enchilada&quot; approach where someone could potentially put ALL of their money.

They could still market it as an alternative investment.  Think about it Ã¢â‚¬ if they can achieve close to a constant monthly return stream, it is by default a non-correlated return stream when compared to **any other asset class** - and thus, a pretty good deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the marketing gimmick being played by this fund, and others of its ilk.  &#8220;We&#8217;ll match the hedge fund &#8216;beta&#8217; and return stream, but be transparent and less expensive, so PLEASE mister institution, place your &#8216;alternative&#8217; allocation with US!&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another idea.  Use the same approach, but rather than model an index, model a **constant** return!, and market it as a &#8220;whole enchilada&#8221; approach where someone could potentially put ALL of their money.</p>
<p>They could still market it as an alternative investment.  Think about it Ã¢â‚¬ if they can achieve close to a constant monthly return stream, it is by default a non-correlated return stream when compared to **any other asset class** &#8211; and thus, a pretty good deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
