<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edhec hedge fund replication research now online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/02/edhec-hedge-fund-replication-research-now-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/02/edhec-hedge-fund-replication-research-now-online/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Abernathy</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/02/edhec-hedge-fund-replication-research-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-58148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Abernathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/12/02/edhec-hedge-fund-replication-research-now-online/#comment-58148</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to Edhec- I do like most of their work- this research is, ahem, quite different from the results acheived by others.  Maybe a little peer-review is in order.

Factor-based alternative beta has been around for a year now (Merrill introduced their product in October, 2006) and the actual results are much more interesting than those obtained by Edhec.

On a daily basis, the corrlelation between the HFRX- which reports daily- and the various alternative beta indices provided by Merrill, Goldman, Stonebrook, etc. is in the mid-80&#039;s.  Moreover, they have substantially outperformed their benchmarks.

Thus far, it seems factor-based alternative beta has delivered what it promised.  The interesting question is: &quot;how should alternative beta be used?&quot;  Well, it can be used as a hedge to create a &quot;pure alpha&quot; portfolio, it can be used in a core/satellite design, or it can be used to gain exposure to the systemic returns of the broad hedge fund industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to Edhec- I do like most of their work- this research is, ahem, quite different from the results acheived by others.  Maybe a little peer-review is in order.</p>
<p>Factor-based alternative beta has been around for a year now (Merrill introduced their product in October, 2006) and the actual results are much more interesting than those obtained by Edhec.</p>
<p>On a daily basis, the corrlelation between the HFRX- which reports daily- and the various alternative beta indices provided by Merrill, Goldman, Stonebrook, etc. is in the mid-80&#8217;s.  Moreover, they have substantially outperformed their benchmarks.</p>
<p>Thus far, it seems factor-based alternative beta has delivered what it promised.  The interesting question is: &#8220;how should alternative beta be used?&#8221;  Well, it can be used as a hedge to create a &#8220;pure alpha&#8221; portfolio, it can be used in a core/satellite design, or it can be used to gain exposure to the systemic returns of the broad hedge fund industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
