<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The mystery of &#8220;slightly positive results&#8221; in hedge funds and college basketball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: allaboutalpha.com: AllAboutAlpha.com</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-96812</link>
		<dc:creator>allaboutalpha.com: AllAboutAlpha.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/#comment-96812</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Hedge funds come unstuck on truth-twisting&#8221;:Ã‚  Aussie newspaper The Age provides a great example of why AIMA felt compelled to put its foot down on anti-hedge fund hype yesterday.Ã‚ Ã‚ The article covers a recent academic study and starts with &#8220;Has the hedge-fund industry been built on a series of lies?&#8221; and continuesÃ‚ on to proclaim, &#8220;Now it looks as if the industry might be based on a more systematic falsehood&#8221;, &#8220;The conclusion? The promise on which the industry was built looks to be largely a false one. If investors start to question the hedge funds&#8217; ability to produce consistently superior returns, they will start to exit the industry in droves - and rightly so.&#8221;Ã‚  (see November &#8216;07 posting on this study) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Hedge funds come unstuck on truth-twisting&#8221;:Ã‚  Aussie newspaper The Age provides a great example of why AIMA felt compelled to put its foot down on anti-hedge fund hype yesterday.Ã‚ Ã‚ The article covers a recent academic study and starts with &#8220;Has the hedge-fund industry been built on a series of lies?&#8221; and continuesÃ‚ on to proclaim, &#8220;Now it looks as if the industry might be based on a more systematic falsehood&#8221;, &#8220;The conclusion? The promise on which the industry was built looks to be largely a false one. If investors start to question the hedge funds&#8217; ability to produce consistently superior returns, they will start to exit the industry in droves &#8211; and rightly so.&#8221;Ã‚  (see November &#8216;07 posting on this study) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miami</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-50583</link>
		<dc:creator>miami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/#comment-50583</guid>
		<description>The Penn article was laughably wrong. Vegas does not set unbiased lines. Vegas does not try to attract &#039;equal action,&#039; known as the Myth of Equal Action among gamblers. 

Certain teams, like Duke, UCLA, Yankees, ND, etc and large favorites attract more money.

The book sets their lines &#039;higher&#039; to force favorite bettors to pay a &#039;tax.&#039; 

Since the line is purposefully higher than a line set merely to attract equal action, favorites don&#039;t cover as much. This is all well-known and established in gambling markets. Ask any LV bookmaker, they freely admit it because Duke fans don&#039;t stop betting Duke because the line is -22 instead of -20.5.

In addition, for really big spreads, it is likely the coach has put the scrubs in. 1st team of the other team can usually narrow the lead on the scrubs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Penn article was laughably wrong. Vegas does not set unbiased lines. Vegas does not try to attract &#8216;equal action,&#8217; known as the Myth of Equal Action among gamblers. </p>
<p>Certain teams, like Duke, UCLA, Yankees, ND, etc and large favorites attract more money.</p>
<p>The book sets their lines &#8216;higher&#8217; to force favorite bettors to pay a &#8216;tax.&#8217; </p>
<p>Since the line is purposefully higher than a line set merely to attract equal action, favorites don&#8217;t cover as much. This is all well-known and established in gambling markets. Ask any LV bookmaker, they freely admit it because Duke fans don&#8217;t stop betting Duke because the line is -22 instead of -20.5.</p>
<p>In addition, for really big spreads, it is likely the coach has put the scrubs in. 1st team of the other team can usually narrow the lead on the scrubs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Academics Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday links: SIV salvage</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/comment-page-1/#comment-50077</link>
		<dc:creator>Academics Blogs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Monday links: SIV salvage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/11/18/the-mystery-of-slightly-positive-results-in-hedge-funds-and-college-basketball/#comment-50077</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;When it comes to hedge funds, the bottom line seems to be clear: donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t rely on the Ã¢â‚¬Å“percent positive monthsÃ¢â‚¬ metric when buying a hedge fund&#8230;&#8221; (All About Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;When it comes to hedge funds, the bottom line seems to be clear: donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t rely on the Ã¢â‚¬Å“percent positive monthsÃ¢â‚¬ metric when buying a hedge fund&#8230;&#8221; (All About Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
