<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 120-20 reaches mythical proportions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John At CIFT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is an â€œintegratedâ€ 130/30 portfolio always better than a â€œcombinedâ€ one?</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/comment-page-1/#comment-122331</link>
		<dc:creator>John At CIFT &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is an â€œintegratedâ€ 130/30 portfolio always better than a â€œcombinedâ€ one?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/#comment-122331</guid>
		<description>[...] There seems to be a growing level of agreement that 130/30 is different than simply adding together a 100â€³ portfolio (e.g. an ETF) and a 30/30â€³ portfolio (e.g. a market neutral fund).  Some practitioners have pointed to the untrimness of being long and short some of the same stocks (e.g. Jacobs &amp; Levy - see related posting).  But others such as First Quadrant&#039;s Jia Ye have argued that adding a short-extension will not always be optimal even for the alpha-producing manager due to the potential volatility of the information coefficient (see posting). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There seems to be a growing level of agreement that 130/30 is different than simply adding together a 100â€³ portfolio (e.g. an ETF) and a 30/30â€³ portfolio (e.g. a market neutral fund).  Some practitioners have pointed to the untrimness of being long and short some of the same stocks (e.g. Jacobs &amp; Levy &#8211; see related posting).  But others such as First Quadrant&#8217;s Jia Ye have argued that adding a short-extension will not always be optimal even for the alpha-producing manager due to the potential volatility of the information coefficient (see posting). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/comment-page-1/#comment-32949</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/#comment-32949</guid>
		<description>Call me a fuddy-duddy.  Few managers have the requisite skill to do well at long only, and 120/20 is if anything more difficult, particularly in an era where the borrow is often crowded.

Let&#039;s see some performance comparisons, and get this out of theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a fuddy-duddy.  Few managers have the requisite skill to do well at long only, and 120/20 is if anything more difficult, particularly in an era where the borrow is often crowded.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see some performance comparisons, and get this out of theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday links: behind the curve &#171; Abnormal Returns</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/comment-page-1/#comment-32886</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday links: behind the curve &#171; Abnormal Returns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/10/14/120-20-reaches-mythical-proportions/#comment-32886</guid>
		<description>[...] On the &#8220;real myths&#8221; surrounding 1X0/X0 investing. (All About Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the &#8220;real myths&#8221; surrounding 1X0/X0 investing. (All About Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
