What a difference a couple of months (and a few cups of coffee) makes
Oct 8th, 2007 | Filed under: Hedge Fund Industry Trends“The market volatility of late summer, which included a huge drop in stock prices from August 6th to August 9th, prompted the financial press to look for a scapegoat. Several journalists and commentators settled on quantitative hedge funds, or ‘quants,’ as the culprits. But did the media get it wrong? New research suggests so.”
Caveat Prognosticator: How the financial press may have gotten the quant story wrong
(The American, October 8th)
What a difference a couple of months makes. On this 2 month anniversary of the infamous August 9th, we look back on the summer’s screaming headlines and compare them to several from this week which seem to herald a very different world. It seems there are always two sides to hedge fund stories. In fact, we believe the way some of these stories have so dramatically evolved lends support to our goal of trying to provide a platform for “sober second thought” on developments in the hedge fund industry.
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.
Related Posts
- The difference between retail and institutional investors
- Alpha “Makes the (Blog) Rounds”
- “Have a contingency plan for 750-1000 bank failures over the next six months”: Leading Academic
- Hedge Funds and Mutual Funds: Not such an odd couple – as long as conflicts of interest are managed
- New surveys on August quant meltdown: Investors have learned a lesson. But have managers?




