Update: Morningstar finally puts on shorts

Sep 28th, 2007 | Filed under: Performance, Analytics & Metrics | By: Alpha Male
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Yahoo! Buzz

You may recall that we had a bone to pick with Morningstar about the absence of any short data on their website (“Existing mutual fund analysis woefully unprepared for 130/30“).

Well “John C” updates the story today with the following comment added to the posting:

Interesting read! For the first time today, I noticed that Morningstar has started to include shorts on their portfolio analysis pages. For example, take a look at this:

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/Portfolio.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=IOTIX#anchor1

When you click on the top holdings, you now see both long and short positions:

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/FundNet/Holdings.aspx?Country=USA&Symbol=IOTIX&fdtab=portfolio

Still, there are improvements to be made, but this is a step in the right direction.

He’s right. The ING 130/30 fund, for example, now includes this nifty graph (circled):

More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. Existing mutual fund analysis woefully unprepared for 130/30
  2. Academic study: Morningstar ratings have “unintended consequence” of being “manipulation proof”
  3. Proposed regulation means shorts going to the dogs?
  4. Morningstar Operational Risk Flags: Due Diligence Goes Online
  5. A Shortage of Shorts?

One comment
Leave a comment »

  1. Morningstar may have shorts, but they don’t know how to analyze them. This week’s Investment News article “Pride of the Quants” quotes a Morningstar analyst saying, “130/30 funds were able to maneuver through August volatility unscathed.” Why? Because they were flat for the month? Given that these products have an average beta of 1.0 to the S&P 500, that means the “30/30 part” was DOWN 5% for the month! Hardly “maneuvering unscathed” and much worse than market neutral funds.

Leave Comment