<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Famous gambler says hedge funds can&#8217;t beat the dealer forever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:53:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-20983</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/#comment-20983</guid>
		<description>Someone at Reuters needs to take algebra again, or provide us with more details on their calculation.  At an 8% decay rate, one will be at 2/3rds the original pool in 5 years.  At double the rate, roughly 2/5ths of the original pool.  Perhaps the missing link is an 8% creation rate, leaving things static now, but at 2/3rds the original size if the decay rate should double?

If hedge funds are mature in terms of percentage of total assets, we should expect the number of players to shrink.  Many smaller firms will be at a competitive disadvantage.  Both Thorp and the guy at Reuters can be right here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone at Reuters needs to take algebra again, or provide us with more details on their calculation.  At an 8% decay rate, one will be at 2/3rds the original pool in 5 years.  At double the rate, roughly 2/5ths of the original pool.  Perhaps the missing link is an 8% creation rate, leaving things static now, but at 2/3rds the original size if the decay rate should double?</p>
<p>If hedge funds are mature in terms of percentage of total assets, we should expect the number of players to shrink.  Many smaller firms will be at a competitive disadvantage.  Both Thorp and the guy at Reuters can be right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good to Go Pile . . . &#171; Trading for the Masses</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-20976</link>
		<dc:creator>Good to Go Pile . . . &#171; Trading for the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2007/08/21/famous-gambler-says-hedge-funds-cant-beat-the-dealer-forever/#comment-20976</guid>
		<description>[...] Famous gambler says hedge funds canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t beat the dealer forever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Famous gambler says hedge funds canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t beat the dealer forever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
