Existing mutual fund analysis woefully unprepared for 130/30
Aug 16th, 2007 | Filed under: 130/30Although there seems to be a lot of sudden interest in delivering 130/30 and long/short funds to the masses, it’s quite apparent that marketing and investor communications are woefully unprepared for these funds.
In a story a couple of weeks ago, Morningstar analyst Todd Trubey proclaimed:
“Supporters include some investors and plenty of marketers who breathlessly describe the 130/30 structure as a breakthrough that will revolutionize investing and amp up returns. Ultimately we think that investors should understand–but look past–the hype and bring a healthy amount of skepticism to the table when judging this group.”
But unfortunately, it seems that neither Morningstar’s fund information, nor the 130/30 fund managers’ very own marketing materials, adequately cover the salient elements of these funds at this point.
Case in point: Trubey mentions the ING 130/30 Fundamental Research Fund (IOTAX) among what he describes as a “handful” of 130/30 mutual funds in existence today.
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.
Related Posts
- Comparing Position-Level and Regression-Based Techniques for Isolating the “Embedded Hedge Fund” in an Active Mutual Fund
- 2007: Year of Hedge/Mutual Fund Convergence?
- A closer look at Bear’s new 130/30 mutual fund
- Mutual fund investors now boarding the 130/30 express
- The Future of Mutual Fund Ratings:




