Is 130/30 Always “High Conviction”?

Jul 25th, 2007 | Filed under: 130/30

We see so many reports these days of new 130/30, 120/20, (1X0/X0) launches that we’ve essentially stopped posting them in the scrolling “alpha ticker” at the top of your screen.  Suffice to say, if your asset manager has a pulse, its probably launching or talking about launching some sort of “short extension” strategy.

But this article by Thomson IM about Investec’s new 130/30 and 120/20 funds raises an interesting question about the primary value proposition of 1X0/X0 funds.  The article is titled:

Investec launches high conviction Global Extension long/short strategy
New fund will give manager James Hand the ability to back himself and turn standard long only fund into 120/20 or 130/30 strategy

The article draws on a veritable fruit salad of alpha-centric buzzwords to describe this fund.  Most, but not all, are synonymous.  While terms like “short extension”, “130/30″, “120/20″, and “long/short” essentially mean the same thing, we don’t think such a fund necessarily involves “high conviction”.

More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. When hiring a fund manager with a conviction can be a good thing.
  2. 2009: The year of the high water mark
  3. New “Portable Alpha” Fund
  4. 130/30 Quant vs. Fundamental: Quants have a bigger spice cabinet
  5. Report: “Exposure yardsticks may provide little insight about a fund’s alpha potential”


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com