Fee Squeeze: A Tale of Two Greeks

Jul 10th, 2007 | Filed under: Investment Management Fees

When it comes to fees, it’s the best of times and the worst of times for hedge funds – depending on their alpha and beta.

The Financial Times provides a good overview of this phenomenon in a story last Monday.  We haven’t always agreed with the FT’s view of the hedge fund industry (see related posting).  But Alphaville, FT’s excellent blog-esque news service, has made up for it by enthusiastically welcoming opposing views.  Says the recent FT piece:

“Who cares when it is surely the total returns that really matter? Well, it is all about fees. Genuine alpha is worth a lot to return-starved investors. It certainly merits the standard 2/20 fee structure, and the best funds charge substantially more. Beta, on the other hand, is a commodity item worth only a few basis points.”

The article comes to a dire conclusion for hedge funds:

More…


To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.

Related Posts

  1. HF fee squeeze: Not such a new thing
  2. McKinsey: Traditional asset managers trapped in a “vise-like” squeeze
  3. Business Week hedge fund story is so “2005″
  4. BlackRock an example of the “vise-like squeeze”?
  5. HF and PE managers square off on implications of credit squeeze


We welcome comments. Please email your comment directly to admin@allaboutalpha.com