Many Registered Representatives Would Prefer to Be Fee Only

Nov 19th, 2006 | Filed under: Investment Management Fees

By: Bruce Kelly, Investment News.com
Published: November 6, 2006  

Is it any surprise that brokers want to throw in the towel on mutual fund trailers and sales commissions when so much of a typical mutual fund can be replicated by (no trailer) ETFs?  Fees based on assets under management would allow advisors the flexibility to use ETFs and hedge funds without the concern of losing revenue.

Read Full Article

Email This Post Email This Post     Print This Post Print This Post

Related Posts

  1. Hedge Funds shouldn’t fear “The Blob”
  2. ETFs and SMAs: Side By Side
  3. Business Week hedge fund story is so “2005″
  4. Unified managed accounts are in vogue, but watch the fees
  5. ETFs: An Advanced Alternative to Indexation

2 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. All About Alpha » Blog Archives » Why Hedge Fund Regulation is All About Alpha January 28th, 2007 11:00 pm :

    [...] “Alpha-centric investing” refers to more than just “portable alpha”. As we have reported on this blog, it encapsulates new operational infrastructures (UMAs), new fee arrangements (performance fees with benchmark hurdles / fee-per-alpha), new metrics (ranking funds based on alpha instead of absolute returns), new organizational structures (small teams of alpha producers), and new advisory models (fee-based vs. commission-based). A recent investment newsletter highlights another domain that is impacted by this simple idea: regulation. [...]

  2. allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com April 30th, 2007 7:32 pm :

    [...] Many Registered Representatives Would Prefer to Be Fee Only  [...]

Leave Comment