Factor Modeling and Benchmarking of Hedge Funds: Can Passive Investment in Hedge Fund Strategies Deliver?
|Oct 19th, 2006 | Filed under: Academic Research, Alternative Beta & Hedge Fund Replication | By: Alpha Male||
By: Lars Jaeger & Christian Wagner, Partners Group
Published: November 7, 2005
This article aims to give reference to this academic effort and provide a coherent discussion on the current status of â€˜beta versus alpha’ controversy in the hedge fund industry.
– Jaeger & Wagner
We admit that we’ve been a little obsessed about the definition of alpha recently. It’s a phase. We’ll grow out of it. But we couldn’t resist the sheer number of Jaeger-isms in this article (i.e. colourful metaphors for alpha). We even threw in a few of our own.
We have discussed the notion that alpha is simply beta that has not yet been commoditized, that hedge fund alpha is often exotic beta, and that systematic active/passive funds can fill the gap between true alpha and true beta. This article sheds additional light on these issues.
A Family Feud
This extensive white paper was co-written by Lars Jaeger, a leading figure in the alternative investment research field (as many of you are aware). It’s a little long, but remarkably easy to follow. Jaeger and Wagner cover a number of key elements in the alpha/beta hedge fund debate.
They essentially divide the world into two feuding families [our term, not Jaeger’s]: those that say hedge fund alpha is just a difficult-to-execute beta and those that they call alpha protagonists (Americans, read: the Hatfields and the McCoys). They say the source of this dichotomy is a lack of general agreement on the definition of alpha in the long-only world, let alone in the hedge fund space.
In attempting to mediate this feud, Jaeger and Wagner propose a sort of continuum from real alpha to alternative beta to traditional beta:
To continue reading this article please login (at the right) or click here to learn more about accessing our archives.