<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treading Where Alpha Does NOT Sum to Zero</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Net Inflows and Time-Varying Alphas: The Case of Hedge Funds</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Net Inflows and Time-Varying Alphas: The Case of Hedge Funds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>[...] But how can this be?Ã‚ Ã‚  Intuition suggests that more assets chasing the same inefficiencyÃ‚ will eventuallyÃ‚ arbitrage- (&#8221;iron&#8221;)Ã‚ out that inefficiency.Ã‚  AsÃ‚ Alexander Ineichen says in his new book, the market &#8220;learns&#8221; or &#8220;becomesÃ‚ immune&#8221; to theÃ‚ arbitrageur (although he does say that markets cannot be perfectly efficient).Ã‚  But according to Beltratti and Morana, market participants have heterogeneous utility functions (a notion also argued by Max Darnell, Joanne Hill,Ã‚ and William Sharpe): &#8220;The wide variety of real world investors, including noise traders and investors with heterogeneous time horizons and objectives, seems to provide plenty of opportunities for hedge funds managers to exploit: the limits of arbitrage do not seem to have been met yet.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But how can this be?Ã‚ Ã‚  Intuition suggests that more assets chasing the same inefficiencyÃ‚ will eventuallyÃ‚ arbitrage- (&#8221;iron&#8221;)Ã‚ out that inefficiency.Ã‚  AsÃ‚ Alexander Ineichen says in his new book, the market &#8220;learns&#8221; or &#8220;becomesÃ‚ immune&#8221; to theÃ‚ arbitrageur (although he does say that markets cannot be perfectly efficient).Ã‚  But according to Beltratti and Morana, market participants have heterogeneous utility functions (a notion also argued by Max Darnell, Joanne Hill,Ã‚ and William Sharpe): &#8220;The wide variety of real world investors, including noise traders and investors with heterogeneous time horizons and objectives, seems to provide plenty of opportunities for hedge funds managers to exploit: the limits of arbitrage do not seem to have been met yet.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Alpha as a Net Zero Sum Game: How Serious a Constraint?</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Alpha as a Net Zero Sum Game: How Serious a Constraint?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/10/01/treading-where-alpha-does-not-sum-to-zero/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] But more importantly, Hill argues that alpha is not actually a &#8220;zero-sum game&#8221;.Ã‚  Like Max Darnell of First Quadrant, she argues that the heterogeneity ofÃ‚ investor utility functions mean that everyone&#8217;s a winner! (Well, if not everyone, atÃ‚ least more than half ofÃ‚ all investors.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But more importantly, Hill argues that alpha is not actually a &#8220;zero-sum game&#8221;.Ã‚  Like Max Darnell of First Quadrant, she argues that the heterogeneity ofÃ‚ investor utility functions mean that everyone&#8217;s a winner! (Well, if not everyone, atÃ‚ least more than half ofÃ‚ all investors.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
