Differentiating Fixed Income Performance with Portable Alpha

Sep 20th, 2006 | Filed under: Portable Alpha & Alpha/Beta Separation

By: Joseph F. Benning, The Chicago Board of Trade
Published: July 2006, AIMA Journal
Excerpts:

“Plan sponsors can disaggregate the returns of fully funded investments into alpha and beta components to better align investment objectives with a manager’s performance. But implementation is easier said than done.”

“While the tools for replicating equity beta exposure have been readily available for some time, the task of efficiently replicating generalized fixed-income exposure has been more problematic.”.

“Active trading of fixed-income based ETF’s is picking up steam, but those instruments tend to be narrow-based, representing sectors of fixed income markets, rather than the market as a whole. In addition, fixed-income sector indices carry implicit idiosyncratic risk related to the behavior of the yield curve.”

“Isolating alpha from beta within a strategy or asset class and then neutralising it requires a fair degree of sophistication.”

Read Full Article

 

Email This Post Email This Post     Print This Post Print This Post

Related Posts

  1. More on fixed income portable alpha
  2. Fixed income 130/30 produces “Pru Alpha” (that’s not a typo)
  3. High-Octane Fixed Income – Refining Absolute Returns from Active Strategies
  4. Fixed Income: A return to the glory days of yesteryear?
  5. Fixed Income 130/30 comes out of hiding

Leave Comment