<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measuring the True Cost of Active Management by Mutual Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/07/05/measuring-the-true-cost-of-active-management-by-mutual-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/07/05/measuring-the-true-cost-of-active-management-by-mutual-funds/</link>
	<description>Hedge funds, portable alpha, 130/30 and alpha-centric investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/07/05/measuring-the-true-cost-of-active-management-by-mutual-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator>allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 01:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=40#comment-6396</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe I&#8217;m working too much.Ã‚  But theÃ‚ more I researchÃ‚ alpha, the lessÃ‚ I know how to define it.Ã‚  While Andrew Lo asks &#8220;Where does alpha come from?&#8221;, I&#8217;m now back at &#8220;What is alpha&#8221;?Ã‚ Ã‚ For example, what might look like alpha over one timeframe is actually &#8220;exotic beta&#8221; when you shift the window of analysis only a few months.Ã‚  WhatÃ‚ looks like alpha vs. one benchmarkÃ‚ may, ofÃ‚ course, beÃ‚ beta when compared to a different benchmark.Ã‚  There&#8217;sÃ‚ &#8221;active weight&#8220;, &#8220;active component&#8220;, &#8220;active share&#8220;, &#8220;absolute returns&#8221;, &#8220;reliance on public information&#8220;, &#8220;manager value-added&#8221; - evenÃ‚ &#8221;accidental alpha&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe I&#8217;m working too much.Ã‚  But theÃ‚ more I researchÃ‚ alpha, the lessÃ‚ I know how to define it.Ã‚  While Andrew Lo asks &#8220;Where does alpha come from?&#8221;, I&#8217;m now back at &#8220;What is alpha&#8221;?Ã‚ Ã‚ For example, what might look like alpha over one timeframe is actually &#8220;exotic beta&#8221; when you shift the window of analysis only a few months.Ã‚  WhatÃ‚ looks like alpha vs. one benchmarkÃ‚ may, ofÃ‚ course, beÃ‚ beta when compared to a different benchmark.Ã‚  There&#8217;sÃ‚ &#8221;active weight&#8220;, &#8220;active component&#8220;, &#8220;active share&#8220;, &#8220;absolute returns&#8221;, &#8220;reliance on public information&#8220;, &#8220;manager value-added&#8221; &#8211; evenÃ‚ &#8221;accidental alpha&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/07/05/measuring-the-true-cost-of-active-management-by-mutual-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=40#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>[...] *What&#8217;s important here isn&#8217;t the absolute value of these numbers, but their ratioÃ‚ (Sharpe ratio) which is about 1.0 - very good indeed.Ã‚  Interested readers should note that the &#8220;active portion&#8221; would be closer to 50%, not 28% under the added constraint that the active portion have the same standard deviation as the market.Ã‚  For much more on this type of analysis, see Ross Miller&#8217;s seminal paper on the topic.Ã‚  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *What&#8217;s important here isn&#8217;t the absolute value of these numbers, but their ratioÃ‚ (Sharpe ratio) which is about 1.0 &#8211; very good indeed.Ã‚  Interested readers should note that the &#8220;active portion&#8221; would be closer to 50%, not 28% under the added constraint that the active portion have the same standard deviation as the market.Ã‚  For much more on this type of analysis, see Ross Miller&#8217;s seminal paper on the topic.Ã‚  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Magellan a &#8220;Frankenfund&#8221;: Professor</title>
		<link>http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/2006/07/05/measuring-the-true-cost-of-active-management-by-mutual-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Alpha &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Magellan a &#8220;Frankenfund&#8221;: Professor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allaboutalpha.com/blog/?p=40#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>[...] So who better to tell the story than Professor Ross Miller of SUNY Albany - a man whose paper on index hugging is in the Portable Alpha Hall of Fame.Ã‚  Miller released this ringing indictment of Magellan last month.Ã‚  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So who better to tell the story than Professor Ross Miller of SUNY Albany &#8211; a man whose paper on index hugging is in the Portable Alpha Hall of Fame.Ã‚  Miller released this ringing indictment of Magellan last month.Ã‚  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
